State Of The Art FAQ
Q: What does "state of the art" mean in the context of medical devices?
A: In the context of medical devices,
“state of the art” refers to the current accepted standard of care
and good practice in technology and medicine. It represents what is generally
acknowledged as the current level of development or advancement in a particular
field. However, the interpretation of “state of the art” can vary
depending on the context and can be influenced by regional medical guidance,
regulatory frameworks, and industry standards.
Q: Why is considering the state of the art important in the medical device industry?
A: Considering the state of the art
is important in the medical device industry because it helps determine the level
of innovation, safety, and effectiveness of a device. It ensures that devices
meet the current accepted standards and practices, and it plays a crucial role
in evaluating the benefit-risk ratio of a device. Understanding the state of
the art helps manufacturers demonstrate compliance with regulatory
requirements, such as the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro
Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) and supports successful CE submissions.
Q: How does risk management relate to the state of the art in medical devices?
A: Risk management in medical devices
should take into account the state of the art. Manufacturers must establish and
maintain a risk management system that aligns with the current accepted
practices and risk control measures. State-of-the-art risk controls should be
used to minimize risks associated with the device. The state of the art is
dynamic and can influence the risk management approach by considering the
latest advancements, technology, and clinical practices. Manufacturers should
conduct a thorough analysis of the state of the art when assessing risks and
developing risk mitigation strategies.
Q: How does the state of the art relate to clinical data in medical devices?
A: The state of the art is important
when evaluating clinical data for medical devices. Manufacturers must consider
the current accepted standards of care and best practices in medicine when
assessing the performance and safety of their devices. They need to consider
all the patient populations that the device is being used in, considering the
condition treated and potential vulnerable groups. The clinical data should
demonstrate that the device achieves a clinical benefit and is safe compared to
alternative treatments or similar devices across the full spectrum of patients
(or users), where it differs it should be highlighted. The state of the art
provides the benchmark for evaluating the clinical evidence of the target
device and helps determine the amount and quality of clinical data is
sufficient against the SoTA range to demonstrate conformity with regulatory
requirements.
Q: Are SOTA literature reviews easy to do?
A: Some common challenges when conducting
a literature review to establish the state of the art in medical devices
include:
- Ensuring comprehensive search results to include all relevant articles
- Providing proof of the literature review process and participation
- Maintaining accuracy and consistency in data entry
- Managing the workload efficiently, especially when multiple literature reviews are required.
Q: Who should conduct a SOTA literature review?
A: Using proper tools, such as correct
literature databases, correct literature search syntax and keywords ensures
suitable articles are identified. The MEDDEV 2.7.1rev4 and EU MDR requires personnel
who conduct the literature reviews and medical writing is suitable qualified
and experienced to undertake Clinical Evaluations (SoTA write-up).
Related Articles
